The LURS:
The Land Use Requirement Study was released last week to Michael de Yoanna at the Independent.
It PROVES again the existance of a plan, which the Army has consistantly said does NOT exist,
and
that plan is calculated to the acre, AND it doesn't make logical sense.
As
you can see, it leaves a lot of empty white space.
And
here's what it looks like when you fill in the blanked-out space with
a seven-digit number like 2,500,000:
It
fits into the blank perfectly. Of course we can't know what the
actual number is, but we can be sure it is seven
digits. This suggests that the LURS is addressing the whole
enchilada. I tried this in all of the blanked-out spaces which
specify the shortfall and it fits each one.
Another interesting thing: On page 24, paragraph two, it talks about their "training scenario" in which "simulated forces move toward PCMS boundary from Kansas across the eastern Colorado prairie or through southern Colorado from New Mexico." It goes on to bemoan the fact that this simulation, "does not afford the individual soldier the chance to employ his weapon system at full capability nor leaders the opportunity to practice command and control over doctrinal distances".
The
paragraph concludes with the statement that such simulations, "cannot
substitute for the ability to maneuver full formations over doctrinal
distances". In other words, they don't want to simulate the enemy
advancing upon Pinon Canyon from the Kansas and New Mexico borders,
they want to acquire that entire area for realistic training.
Through
out the LURS TC 25-1 is referenced as the source of "doctrinal
distances" that calculations are based upon. Here's what
TC 25-1 indicates as the requirement for Brigade Unit of Action:
This 150x150 km maneuver box has appeared elsewhere, (Robert Stack interview.) It converts to 5,559,871.08 acres. Look at page 1 of the LURS. It says, "As Future Force Units of Action (AU) requirements are developed, their Area of Operation will be up to 17,700".
This
converts to 4,373,765.25 acres.
Both of these numbers are more than the 2.5 million on the leaked map,
but who says the Army would, or has to stop at the state line?
One
more tidbit: The words, "The Nature Conservancy" fit
perfectly into the blanked-out spaces on page vii paragraph 1.

This quote from the LURS has 3 very important facets. First it calls into question the decision of the Eminent Domain seizure of the existing PCMS as the best alternative for training, given the area NOT availible for training. That, or course, applies to the plans to seizr more square miles to expand the PCMS.
Second, it makes the point that the areas around and feeding into he Purgatory River are being polluted with Lead, Depleted Uranium, and, in the case of the so-called "green ammo", which has been documented to be anything but "green", Tungsten and Tin. This is an issue for everyone drinking, watering cattle, or growing crops down to the John Martin Reservour and then the Arkansas River downstream to the Gulf of Mexico.
The third thing this documents is the decision to expand the PCMS in this canyon area to the east, which is at least as impacted by unusable training grounds from canyons, artifacts, Petroglyphs, burial grounds, the Sante Fe Trail, Dinosaur tracks, etc., as the existing PCMS, is a mistake on top of a mistake.

This is the redacted square kilometers needed for the training of the incrreased troop levels at Fort Carson.

This is the 8x31 kilometer box that PCMS has now that will support battalion size training

This is the acreage of the existing PCMS unvailible for training:
